Last updated: February 2026
This document sets out our compliance rationale and legal basis for the services we provide. It is maintained as a reference for regulators, clients, and stakeholders, and reflects our genuine belief that our services operate lawfully and in the interests of the businesses we engage with.
1. PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT
Comet Studios provides two distinct categories of service: (1) AI-powered content creation from website scanning via Comet Content Studio, and (2) B2B email outreach on behalf of clients via our Send on Behalf service. This document explains our legal rationale for each service, referencing the specific provisions of the Australian Spam Act 2003 (Cth) and the New Zealand Unsolicited Electronic Messages Act 2007 that we believe support our operating model.
2. SERVICE 1 — WEBSITE SCANNING FOR CONTENT CREATION
2.1 What We Do
Our platform uses automated scanning technology to visit publicly accessible business websites and capture page content, screenshots, and visual elements. This data is used exclusively to generate promotional marketing content — Video Reels, Slide Decks, Talking Head presentations, and Interactive Guided Tours — for the business whose website was scanned.
2.2 What We Do Not Do
2.3 Legal Basis — Why This Is Not Address Harvesting
Under AU Spam Act 2003, Schedule 2, Clause 3: "Address-harvesting software" is defined as software that is designed or marketed for use in searching the internet for electronic addresses and collecting, capturing, or otherwise harvesting those addresses. Our scanning software captures visual content (text, images, layout) for video generation — it is not designed for, marketed for, or used for collecting electronic addresses. It therefore falls entirely outside the definition.
Under NZ UEM Act 2007, Section 9: A person must not use "address-harvesting software" or a "harvested-address list" in connection with sending unsolicited commercial electronic messages. Section 4 defines address-harvesting software as software specifically designed to search for electronic addresses on the internet. Our scanning software searches for page content and visual elements for video creation — a fundamentally different purpose. No electronic addresses are targeted, extracted, or stored by the scanner.
3. SERVICE 2 — B2B EMAIL OUTREACH (SEND ON BEHALF)
3.1 What We Do
Our Send on Behalf service enables businesses to have promotional video content delivered via email to other businesses in their target industry and geographic area. We source, verify, and manage the contact database. The client never sees individual contact details — only aggregated delivery statistics.
3.2 Contact Data Sourcing — Separate from Website Scanning
All contact data used for B2B outreach is sourced from an independently maintained master database compiled from:
This database is compiled through manual research and verification — not through automated web scraping or address-harvesting software. Contact data sourcing is an entirely separate process from our website content scanning service.
3.3 Legal Basis — Australian Spam Act 2003
Section 16(1) — Prohibition and Consent Exception: The Act prohibits sending unsolicited commercial electronic messages unless the recipient has consented. We rely on inferred consent as defined in Schedule 2.
Schedule 2, Clause 2 — Inferred Consent via Conspicuous Publication: Consent may be inferred where:
Our campaigns satisfy all three conditions: we target business owners, CEOs, and senior decision-makers using addresses published in public directories, and we send content directly relevant to their business marketing — specifically, a professional video showcasing their own business.
Schedule 2, Clause 2(1)(d) — Role-Based Relevance: The message must relate to the recipient's role within their organisation. A marketing video about the recipient's own business is inherently relevant to a business owner, CEO, or marketing decision-maker. This is the strongest possible relevance connection.
Section 16(6)-(9) — Sender Identification & Compliance: Every message we send includes the client's legal business name, physical address, ABN, and a functional unsubscribe link, fully satisfying the sender identification requirements.
3.4 Legal Basis — New Zealand UEM Act 2007
Section 6 — Deemed Consent: Consent is deemed to exist where all three conditions are met:
Our campaigns meet all three conditions. We target business owners and senior decision-makers whose contact details are published in public business directories. The content — a professional marketing video about their own business — is directly relevant to their role as the person responsible for business development and marketing decisions.
Section 9 — Address Harvesting Prohibition: We do not use address-harvesting software as defined in Section 4 of the Act. Our contact database is compiled from publicly available directories through manual research and verification, not through automated internet scraping.
Section 11 — Sender Identification: Every email identifies who authorised the sending (the client), includes their contact details and physical address, and provides a free functional unsubscribe facility.
Section 12 — Unsubscribe: Unsubscribe requests are honoured within 5 working days. Suppression is permanent and cross-channel — once someone opts out, they are never contacted again through any campaign managed by us.
4. WHY OUR SERVICES BENEFIT THE BUSINESSES WE CONTACT
We believe our outreach is genuinely in the interest of the businesses we contact, for the following reasons:
5. SEPARATION OF SERVICES — CONTENT SCANNING VS CONTACT SOURCING
It is critical to understand that our two core activities — website scanning and contact sourcing — are entirely separate processes with different purposes, different data flows, and different legal frameworks:
Website Content Scanning
Contact Data Sourcing
Where a scanned website URL is cross-referenced against our master contact database to identify the corresponding business contact, this is a database lookup — not an extraction from the website. The contact data pre-exists in our independently sourced database before any scan takes place.
6. RECORD KEEPING & COMPLIANCE EVIDENCE
We maintain comprehensive records to demonstrate compliance if required by ACMA (Australia) or the DIA Anti-Spam Compliance Unit (New Zealand):
7. REGULATORY REFERENCES
This compliance rationale was last reviewed in February 2026. It reflects our understanding of applicable legislation at the time of writing. We are committed to ongoing compliance and will update this document as laws or our services evolve.